Blog | Reading Time 7 minutes

Extending Herd Longevity to Mitigate Enteric Methane Emissions

Extending Herd Longevity to Mitigate Enteric Methane Emissions

Growing concerns about climate change and food security have heightened scrutiny of the animal feed industry, particularly because enteric methane accounts for 45.4% of livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions.1 As farmers seek paths towards improving sustainability of milk production, part of the solutions may lie in fundamental herd management.

Nico Vreeburg, a veterinarian and technical services manager for ruminants at Lallemand Animal Nutrition, suggests that focusing on animal health delivers multiple benefits. “Maintaining healthier cows isn’t just economically sound; it’s also proving to be a crucial strategy for farmers looking to reduce the carbon intensity of dairy production,” he says.

The Link Between Longevity and Sustainable Production

Longevity is a keyword in dairy farm sustainability. According to research, dairy cow productivity increases with each lactation cycle until reaching a plateau around the fifth lactation (Table 1). This increased lifetime production leads to lower methane emissions per unit of milk. By investing in herd health to extend productive lifespans, farmers can optimize their environmental impact per liter of milk.

Milk production per lactation kg milk gr methane per kg milk
Lactation 1 8.399 14.72
Lactation 2 9.499 14.00
Lactation 3 10.067 13.00
Lactation 4 10.220 13.60
Lactation > =5 9.952 13.80

Table 1. Methane exhaust per lactation (Van Laar e.a., 2004, Van Straalen, 2006, CRV 2010)

“Doubling a cow’s lifetime lactations from 2.5 to five reduces the need for herd replacements while typically increasing milk output, with older cows generally producing more milk,” Vreeburg explains. He points to farms where exceptional longevity resulted in replacement rates of just 12-15% over eight years, equivalent to six to seven lactations per cow. “Measures often focus on daily production per cow, but lifetime production serves as a more meaningful sustainability indicator.”

While 50,000 kg is considered sustainable production, many farms consistently achieve 60,000 to 70,000 kg, significantly reducing milk’s carbon footprint. During the 23 months it takes to raise a heifer and the dry period before calving, cows eat feed and produce methane but don’t make milk (Table 2). Minimizing these unproductive phases can help increase overall output while reducing emissions per kilogram of milk.

Calving age heifers in months Production 1st lactation (kg) Lifetime production (kg)
21 8.888 21.330
22 10.075 31.230
23 10.363 38.345
24 11.298 36.154
25 10.026 32.085
26 9.332 21.465
27 9.504 19.960

Table 2. Milk production related to first calving age (Van Laar e.a., 2004,Van Straalen, 2006)

Building the Foundation: Health Management

Extending cow longevity requires comprehensive health management that addresses problems before they force early culling. From his veterinary experience, Vreeburg observed an overemphasis on treating sick animals rather than maintaining animals healthy, hence preventing illness. “The focus should shift toward reducing health risks through preventive measures,” he notes.

This health management approach starts with basics: good quality bedding and promoting beneficial microorganisms in the direct animal environment. However, even the healthiest farm environment won’t extend herd life if cows can’t reproduce successfully.

Reproductive issues are a leading cause of cow culling, making fertility management crucial for extending herd longevity. The critical window lies in those first 100 days of lactation, when a cow’s nutritional status can make or break her reproductive future. During early lactation, maintaining optimal body condition becomes a delicate balancing act.

“Farmers understand that a cow cycling regularly and conceiving on schedule represents the successful orchestration of dozens of interconnected management practices,” Vreeburg observes. “Each one contributes to her ability to maintain both peak milk production and reproductive readiness simultaneously.”

Maximizing Feed Efficiency for Improved Sustainability of Milk Production

While reproductive success keeps cows in the herd longer, the nutritional foundation that supports both reproduction and overall cow performance centers on feed efficiency, particularly during the challenging transition from dry cow to peak lactation.

Research has shown that rumen-specific live yeast can stabilize the rumen microbiota during the dramatic dietary shift from dry cow to lactation rations.3 These specialized yeasts promote beneficial bacteria growth and help buffer rumen pH, which can help reduce the risk of acidosis that commonly disrupts feed intake during early lactation.

Studies also quantified these benefits, showing that live yeast supplementation can reduce bodyweight loss by up to 30kg in the first 60 days of lactation – representing 5% of a typical 600kg dairy cow’s total bodyweight. This benefit in the maintenance of body condition translates to fewer health problems and enhanced reproductive performance, while simultaneously boosting feed efficiency by up to 7%, allowing cows to extract more energy from the same ration.2 The combined effect creates a positive cycle where optimized rumen health drives improved overall cow performance.

Imagine unlocking the hidden potential in every kilogram of feed that cows consume. The sustainability implications are significant: farmers can either maintain current milk production while reducing feed costs by up to 6%, or achieve the same remarkable efficiency gains in reverse turning existing feed into additional milk output.

“When we can help cows extract more energy from every kilogram of feed, we’re not just improving economics, we’re reducing the environmental cost per liter of milk produced,” Vreeburg explains. “It’s a perfect example of how nutritional precision supports both longevity and sustainability goals.”

Quality Forage is a Cornerstone of Enhanced Milk Production

Even the most advanced nutritional supplements can’t make up for poor-quality silage, which forms the foundation of every high-quality ration. Maximizing the use of homegrown forages is central to profitable dairy farming and plays a key role in producing milk more efficiently.

Improving silage quality begins with excellent crop and bunker management—skills that many dairy farmers have already mastered. “However, taking shortcuts in these processes, such as skipping the application of silage inoculants, can compromise quality and undermine overall silage goals. This not only leads to suboptimal nutritional outcomes but also negatively affects production performance and the farm’s sustainability targets,” he warns.

Using forage inoculants supports better preservation and reduces the risk of heating and spoilage in the bunker — key to minimizing losses and avoiding poor-quality silage that can impair cow performance. Whether preserving silage or whole crop cereals, consistent conservation practices lead to improved production and longer herd longevity, directly supporting farm sustainability goals.

The Path Forward: Integration for Impact

By investing in optimizing herd performance through proper nutrition and management, farmers can increase the proportion of cows who remain productive for longer, maximizing the potential of every animal. The key lies in understanding how each management decision contributes to the ultimate goal of extending productive herd life.

“When we focus on maintaining optimal cow performance, we’re not just thinking about today’s milk production, we’re adapting our herd management to more sustainable practices,” says Vreeburg. “Every day a cow stays productive in the herd is a win for both farm economics and milk carbon intensity.”

The path to more sustainable dairy production doesn’t require revolutionary changes, but rather the disciplined application of proven strategies that keep cows healthy, productive, and in the herd longer. In an industry facing increasing environmental scrutiny, the solution may be as straightforward as helping every cow reach her full productive potential for longer.

References

  • 1 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2022). Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM), version 3.0. Animal Production and Health Division. https://www.fao.org/gleam/en
  • 2 Bach A., A. López-García, O. González-Recio, G. Elcoso, F. Fàbregas, F. Chaucheyras-Durand, M. Castex. 2019. Changes in the rumen and colon microbiota and effects of live yeast dietary supplementation during the transition from the dry period to lactation of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., Vol. 102, Issue 7:6180-6198
  • 3 Schwarz F. J. and T. Ettle. 2002. Effect of yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, LEVUCELL SC CNCM I-1077) on performance of beef and dairy cattle. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 11

Published Nov 19, 2025

RuminantSustainability